New airport technology deters terrorists by mind-reading-09 March, 2010

"So when can airport security personnel begin to read the minds of would-be terrorists? Perhaps in the near future.


An Israeli company, WeCu Technologies claims to have devised a method to identify airline passengers with evil intentions by reading the reactions of passengers to certain “stimuli.”


In the system being tested in Israel, projectors at airport terminals flash different images associated with a certain terrorist group or symbols that only a would-be terrorist would recognize.


The assumption is that people cannot hide their reactions to certain images, just as anyone might react to a photo of a close relative suddenly appearing on a wall.


The technology uses hidden cameras aimed at the passing face to capture and analyze even the most subtle reactions. Even an averted glance or a slight increase in heart rate could signal a passenger's intentions.


If the cameras pick up suspicious looks or movement, the passenger can be pulled aside for further screening.


'One-by-one you can screen out from the flow of people those with specific malicious intent,' WeCu Chief Executive Ehud Given told the AP."

Everything You Need to Know About Airport Security: A Primer for 2010

On its website, the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) says, "At this time, security checkpoint requirements for passengers departing U.S. airports remain the same. Passengers do not need to do anything differently, but they may notice additional security measures at the airport. TSA's checkpoint security screening procedures for persons with disabilities and medical conditions have not changed. TSA permits prescription liquid medications and other liquids needed by persons with disabilities and medical conditions."

The contradiction in this paragraph is at the heart of travelers' questions about airport security. Requirements "remain the same," but passengers may notice "additional security measures." What does this mean in practical terms?

Basically, travelers can bring the same things they could before the Christmas bombing attack, but their bags, particularly carry-ons, will receive much more scrutiny. In a recent New York Times article, Michelle Higgins outlines several clever ways to minimize the extra attention our luggage will inevitably receive. Tips include placing any potentially suspicious-looking items, such as a bar of soap (yes, a bar of soap), near the top of your bag, or using special laptop bags which permit unobstructed X-rays of the laptop. It's also important as ever to know the rules, especially when it comes to liquids.

This extra scrutiny can also extend to your person, in the form of pat-downs. The TSA is continuing its procedure of screening passengers wearing certain types of clothes, saying "passengers wearing loose fitting or bulky clothing—including headwear—may be subject to additional screening. In instances where passengers choose not to remove bulky clothing, including headwear, our officers are trained to offer a private screening area and may conduct a pat down search to clear the individual."

Higgins echoes that last point, saying, "Under TSA regulations, travelers may request a private area for a pat down, which could be a separate room or an area out of the view of the general public. You can also ask for a security officer of the same sex, though you may have to wait if one is not immediately available."

New Technology

Of course, "additional security measures" don't merely include bag searches and pat downs. Shortly after the Christmas attack, the Department of Homeland Security ordered 300 whole-body imaging scanners to be deployed throughout the country in 2010. And the president's proposed budget for 2011 requests $734 million to fund the deployment of 1,000 more scanners.

Bottom line: Get ready to be scanned.

The effectiveness of these scanners is far from certain, and though they have been largely accepted by the public as a necessary aspect of airport security, serious privacy issues remain.

International Travel

One of the TSA's most controversial moves following the Christmas attack was to identify 14 nations it considers "state sponsors of terrorism" or simply "countries of interest," and subject travelers from or passing through those countries to enhanced screening.

The fourteen nations are Afghanistan, Algeria, Cuba, Lebanon, Libya, Iran, Iraq, Nigeria, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, and Yemen.

Fortunately, American citizens, even those traveling through one of the countries, should not automatically face this enhanced screening, which can include full-body pat downs, thorough bag searches, and body scanners. But any traveler exhibiting certain behavior or whose baggage appears to contain suspicious items can be selected for additional screening.

Oh, Canada

In early January, carry-ons were banned for travel from the U.S. to Canada, causing more than a bit of concern, especially with the Olympics on the horizon. But few weeks later, the rules were eased, allowing passengers to bring one carry-on bag, though not without a long list of rules and exceptions.

Other Carry-On Restrictions

For some unknown yet supposedly security-related reason, American Airlines is only allowing one carry-on for some flights from Europe, as opposed to the traditional allowance of one carry-on and one personal item. Frequent fliers and first- or business-class travelers can still bring that additional personal item. The destinations affected are Barcelona, Brussels, Dublin, Frankfurt, London, Madrid, Manchester, Milan, Paris, Rome, and Zurich.

American says the restrictions will be in place "until further notice," so travelers should check the airline website before flying to any of the listed destinations.

Secure Flight

Secure Flight is the TSA's new program of collecting passengers' birthdates and gender, in addition to names, during the booking process. The TSA claims this allows for more accurate matching of names on the no-fly and watchlists, and should cut down on the instances of misidentification that have plagued the process for years.

Since August, the TSA has been phasing in this program airline by airline. American was among the first airlines to begin collecting this additional data, and domestic implementation is expected to be complete early this year, with international implementation not too far behind.

Global Entry

Part of the U.S. Customs and Border Patrol's (CBP) Trusted Traveler program, Global Entry allows verified U.S. citizens to bypass passport control at about two dozen major airports across the country. Global Entry was launched as a test pilot program last June, and made permanent late last year. CBP describes the program as such:

"The process requires participants to present their machine-readable U.S. passport or permanent resident card, submit their fingerprints for biometric verification, and make a customs declaration at the kiosk's touch-screen. Upon successful completion of the Global Entry process at the kiosk, the traveler is issued a transaction receipt and directed to baggage claim and the exit, unless chosen for a selective or random secondary referral."

Citizens must apply to the program and pay a $100 non-refundable fee, and there's no guarantee that all applicants will be accepted. But for frequent international travelers, the benefit of skipping long lines at customs may be well worth the hassle and expense.

Stay Tuned ...

The catch to all of this is that while circumstances certainly have "settled," the airport security measures outlined here could change at any time, especially if there's an incident. Travelers should pay close attention to the news, and double-check the rules and restrictions for specific destinations and airlines before traveling. And again, we will be updating this document as new information comes out.

Circular aims to tackle blogging violations

The Ministry of Information and Communications (MIC) Tuesday issued a circular that aims to create a legal platform for dealing with violations committed by bloggers.
The circular forbids and restricts the uploading of many kinds of information on blogs, which it defines as personal e-information sites created and registered on the Internet, and used to display personal information to store, exchange, or share with a group of people or a community using Internet services.
It says bloggers cannot provide, disseminate or create direct links to information that is prohibited in a decree issued in August on the management, provision and use of the Internet and e-information on the Internet.
The decree forbids the circulation of information which undermines Vietnam’s national security and social order, revealing classified information, or instigating war and violence.
Pornographic, superstitious and defamatory content are also banned under the decree.
The circular states that bloggers are barred from using blogs to fake others’ identities or posting information harmful to other’s legitimate rights.
Bloggers also cannot post media, art or literature products prohibited by Vietnam’s Civil Codes or copyright laws.
Blog creators and users are responsible for content uploaded onto their sites and have to protect their password and personal information, the circular says.
Service providers must detect, prevent and get rid of banned information when asked by governmental blog management agencies, it notes.
Deputy Minister of Information and Communications, Do Quy Doan, said it was necessary to create a legal framework for blogging as it was complicated and sensitive by nature.
He said the circular aimed to create a legal base for related agencies to tackle violations in the area of blogging.
Luu Vu Hai, head of the ministry’s Administration for Radio Broadcast, Television and e-Information, said the circular was meant to instruct and raise awareness of a healthier online environment.
“The circular is more about ‘instruction’ than ‘management.’” Hai said.
The blogging community, however, feels that the circular will not go far. Blog entries in the wake of the circular had many saying it was nearly impossible to manage a virtual and random world like blogs.
Reported by Truong Son

New report highlights ties between global warming and US security

A new National Intelligence Assessment says that food shortages and migration caused by a warming climate could threaten US national security by aggravating ethnic strife around the globe, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa.
The Washington Post writes that Thomas Fingar, chairman of the National Intelligence Council, delivered the report Wednesday to a joint meeting of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence and the House Select Committee on Energy Independence. He warned that global warming will reduce food supplies in Africa, which he predicted would in turn spark violence in the region.
"Without food aid, the region will likely face higher levels of instability, particularly violent ethnic clashes over land ownership," probably creating "extensive and novel operational requirements," for the fledgling U.S. Africa Command, according to a National Intelligence Assessment on the security implications of climate change by the National Intelligence Council. ...
Overall, the assessment found that while the United States "is better equipped than most nations to deal with climate change," the impact on other countries has the "potential to seriously affect U.S. national security interests." Humanitarian disasters, economic migration, food and water shortages - all caused by climate change - will pressure other countries to respond. Such demands "may significantly tax U.S. military transportation and support force structures, resulting in a strained readiness posture," the assessment found.

more info--->>>>New report highlights ties between global warming and US security